Intergenerational Equitable Climate Change Mitigation: Negative Effects of Stochastic Interest Rates; Positive Effects of Financing
Today's decisions on climate change mitigation affect the damage that future generations will bear. Discounting future benefits and costs of climate change mitigation is one of the most critical components of assessing efficient climate mitigation pathways. We extend the DICE model with stochastic discount rates to reflect the uncertain nature of discount rates. Stochastic rates give rise to a stochastic mitigation strategy, resulting in all model quantities becoming stochastic. We show that the optimization procedure of the DICE model induces intergenerational inequality: lacking a mechanism to regulate burden, future generations have to bear higher costs from abatement and damage relative to GDP. Further, we show that considering uncertainty of discount rates and their feedback to abatement policies, which can be interpreted as successive re-calculation, increases intergenerational inequality (and adds additional risks). Motivated by this, we consider additional financing risks by investigating two modifications of DICE. We find that allowing financing of abatement costs and considering non-linear financing effects for large damages improves intergenerational effort sharing. To conclude our discussion of options to improve intergenerational equity in an IAM, we propose a modified optimization to keep costs below 3% of GDP, resulting in more equal distribution of efforts between generations.
Code (1)
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Intergenerational Equity in Models of Climate Change Mitigation: Stochastic Interest Rates introduce Adverse Effects, but (Non-linear) Funding Costs can Improve Intergenerational Equity
Assessing the costs of climate change is essential to finding efficient pathways for the transition to a net-zero emissions economy, which is necessary to stabilise global temperatures at any level. In evaluating the ben…
The Paradox of Doom: Acknowledging Extinction Risk Reduces the Incentive to Prevent It
We investigate the salience of extinction risk as a source of impatience. Our framework distinguishes between human extinction risk and individual mortality risk while allowing for various degrees of intergenerational al…
Minimax-Regret Climate Policy with Deep Uncertainty in Climate Modeling and Intergenerational Discounting
Integrated assessment models have become the primary tools for comparing climate policies that seek to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Policy comparisons have often been performed by considering a planner who seeks to m…
Power and accountability in reinforcement learning applications to environmental policy
Machine learning (ML) methods already permeate environmental decision-making, from processing high-dimensional data on earth systems to monitoring compliance with environmental regulations. Of the ML techniques available…
Decision MakingManagementreinforcement-learningReinforcement Learning+1Improving extreme weather events detection with light-weight neural networks
To advance automated detection of extreme weather events, which are increasing in frequency and intensity with climate change, we explore modifications to a novel light-weight Context Guided convolutional neural network …
Data AugmentationFeature EngineeringSemantic Segmentation