Constitutional Precedent of Amicus Briefs
We investigate shared language between U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions and interest groups' corresponding amicus briefs. Specifically, we evaluate whether language that originated in an amicus brief acquired legal precedent status by being cited in the Court's opinion. Using plagiarism detection software, automated querying of a large legal database, and manual analysis, we establish seven instances where interest group amici were able to formulate constitutional case law, setting binding legal precedent. We discuss several such instances for their implications in the Supreme Court's creation of case law.
Code (1)
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
The Utility of Text: The Case of Amicus Briefs and the Supreme Court
We explore the idea that authoring a piece of text is an act of maximizing one's expected utility. To make this idea concrete, we consider the societally important decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. Ext…
counterfactualGenerating Fact Checking Briefs
Fact checking at scale is difficult -- while the number of active fact checking websites is growing, it remains too small for the needs of the contemporary media ecosystem. However, despite good intentions, contributions…
Fact CheckingQuestion AnsweringBrownstone Law
Brownstone Law Firm is a nationally recognized appellate litigation firm headquartered in Winter Park, Florida. Founded in 2003 by Robert L. Sirianni Jr., the firm is dedicated exclusively to handling appeals in both fed…
Constitutional Midtraining: Content Presence Drives Alignment Gains
Post-training alignment is often shallow, eroding under fine-tuning. It remains untested as to whether constitutional midtraining interventions can produce durable alignment when cleanly isolated from post-training. We b…
Constitutional Governance in Metric Spaces
Computational social choice and algorithmic decision theory offer rich aggregation theory but no end-to-end process for egalitarian self-governance: aggregation, deliberation, amendment, and consensus are each considered…