The Utility of Text: The Case of Amicus Briefs and the Supreme Court
We explore the idea that authoring a piece of text is an act of maximizing one's expected utility. To make this idea concrete, we consider the societally important decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. Extensive past work in quantitative political science provides a framework for empirically modeling the decisions of justices and how they relate to text. We incorporate into such a model texts authored by amici curiae ("friends of the court" separate from the litigants) who seek to weigh in on the decision, then explicitly model their goals in a random utility model. We demonstrate the benefits of this approach in improved vote prediction and the ability to perform counterfactual analysis.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
counterfactualSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Constitutional Precedent of Amicus Briefs
We investigate shared language between U.S. Supreme Court majority opinions and interest groups' corresponding amicus briefs. Specifically, we evaluate whether language that originated in an amicus brief acquired legal p…
Predicting the Law Area and Decisions of French Supreme Court Cases
In this paper, we investigate the application of text classification methods to predict the law area and the decision of cases judged by the French Supreme Court. We also investigate the influence of the time period in w…
General Classificationtext-classificationText ClassificationGenerating Fact Checking Briefs
Fact checking at scale is difficult -- while the number of active fact checking websites is growing, it remains too small for the needs of the contemporary media ecosystem. However, despite good intentions, contributions…
Fact CheckingQuestion AnsweringJUSTICE: A Benchmark Dataset for Supreme Court's Judgment Prediction
Artificial intelligence is being utilized in many domains as of late, and the legal system is no exception. However, as it stands now, the number of well-annotated datasets pertaining to legal documents from the Supreme …
Blind Judgement: Agent-Based Supreme Court Modelling With GPT
We present a novel Transformer-based multi-agent system for simulating the judicial rulings of the 2010-2016 Supreme Court of the United States. We train nine separate models with the respective authored opinions of each…