paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Cross-Species RSA Reveals Conserved Early Visual Alignment but Divergent Higher-Area Rankings Across Human fMRI and Macaque Electrophysiology

2026-05-21 · Nils Leutenegger arxiv

CORRECTION (August 2026): an evaluation-mode defect in the shared feature-extraction pipeline affected the predictive-coding and STDP conditions. It applies to both sides of every comparison here: the human values are reprinted from the companion study and the macaque values use the same checkpoints. In a single-seed re-evaluation with repaired checkpoints, macaque STDP at V1 moves from 0.305 to 0.266 and PC from 0.210 to 0.178, level with the untrained baseline, so finding (2) holds for STDP but not for PC; the V4 and IT orderings also change, while V2 is unchanged. Findings (1), (3) and (4) are unaffected, and the other conditions change by at most 0.0034. The five-seed analysis, Kendall's tau, noise ceilings and stimulus control have not been re-computed. See the correction note on page 1; the original abstract below is unchanged from v1. Follow-up study: arXiv:2608.12408. Does the relationship between learning rules and brain alignment generalize across species? We test the same five learning rules against macaque electrophysiology. The macaque data come from MajajHong2015 (V4/IT, 3,200 presentations, 88/168 neurons) and FreemanZiemba2013 (V1/V2, 135 stimuli, 102/103 neurons). Using RSA with identical model weights from our human study, we find: (1) all models achieve higher alignment with macaque early visual cortex (rho = 0.15-0.30 at V1/V2) than with human fMRI (rho = 0.01-0.08); (2) STDP and PC produce the highest macaque V1/V2 alignment; (3) at IT, rankings show no detectable correlation across species (Kendall's tau = 0.00), though this null is expected given that n = 5 provides power only at tau = +/-1.0; (4) a pretrained ResNet-50 achieves rho = 0.25 at macaque IT, substantially above all custom CNN conditions (rho = 0.07-0.14), suggesting IT alignment is limited by model capacity rather than by the learning rule.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.22401

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Lost in Translation: How Language Re-Aligns Vision for Cross-Species Pathology

2026-01-24 · Ekansh Arora arxiv

Foundation models are increasingly applied to computational pathology, yet their behavior under cross-cancer and cross-species transfer remains unspecified. This study investigated how fine-tuning CPath-CLIP affects canc…

Cancer Classification

Spatial Cognition: a Wave Hypothesis

2024-05-16 · Robert Worden

Animals build Bayesian 3D models of their surroundings, to control their movements. There is strong selection pressure to make these models as precise as possible, given their sense data. A previous paper has described h…

Object Tracking

Highly conserved sequence-specific double-stranded DNA binding networks contributing to divergent genomic evolution of human and chimpanzee brain development

2024-09-12 · Gennadi Glinsky

Emergence during mammalian evolution of concordant and divergent traits of genomic regulatory networks encompassing ubiquitous, qualitatively nearly identical yet quantitatively distinct arrays of sequences of transcript…

Hierarchical Multi-Label Contrastive Learning for Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction Across Organisms

2025-07-03 · Shiyi Liu, Buwen Liang, Yuetong Fang, Zixuan Jiang 외 arxiv

Recent advances in AI for science have highlighted the power of contrastive learning in bridging heterogeneous biological data modalities. Building on this paradigm, we propose HIPPO (HIerarchical Protein-Protein interac…

Contrastive Learning

Improving spliced alignment by modeling splice sites with deep learning

2025-06-15 · Siying Yang, Neng Huang, Heng Li

Motivation: Spliced alignment refers to the alignment of messenger RNA (mRNA) or protein sequences to eukaryotic genomes. It plays a critical role in gene annotation and the study of gene functions. Accurate spliced alig…