paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Does it Really Count? Assessing Semantic Grounding in Text-Guided Class-Agnostic Counting

2026-05-04 · Giacomo Pacini, Luca Ciampi, Nicola Messina, Nicola Tonellotto, Giuseppe Amato, Fabrizio Falchi arxiv

Open-world text-guided class-agnostic counting (CAC) has emerged as a flexible paradigm for counting arbitrary object classes by using natural language prompts. However, current evaluation protocols primarily focus on standard counting errors within single-category images, overlooking a fundamental requirement: the ability to correctly ground the textual prompt in the visual scene. In this paper, we show that several state-of-the-art CAC models often struggle to determine which object class should be counted based on the given prompt, revealing a misalignment between textual semantics and visual object representations. This limitation leads to spurious counting responses and reduced reliability in real-world scenarios. To systematically address these limitations, we propose a new evaluation framework focused on model robustness and trustworthiness. Our contribution is two-fold: (i) we introduce PrACo++ (Prompt-Aware Counting++), a novel test suite featuring two dedicated evaluation protocols -- the negative-label test and the distractor test -- paired with new specialized metrics; and (ii) we present the MUCCA (MUlti-Category Class-Agnostic counting) evaluation dataset, a new collection of real-world images featuring multiple annotated object categories per scene, unlike existing CAC benchmarks that typically include a single category per image. Our extensive experimental evaluation of 10 state-of-the-art methods shows that, despite strong performance under standard counting metrics, current models exhibit significant weaknesses in understanding and grounding object class descriptions. Finally, we provide a quantitative analysis of how semantic similarity between prompts influences these failures. Overall, our results underscore the need for more semantically grounded architectures and offer a reliable framework for future assessment in open-world text-guided CAC methods.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2605.02752

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Semantic Similarity

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Grounding Fallacies Misrepresenting Scientific Publications in Evidence

2024-08-23 · Max Glockner, Yufang Hou, Preslav Nakov, Iryna Gurevych

Health-related misinformation claims often falsely cite a credible biomedical publication as evidence, which superficially appears to support the false claim. The publication does not really support the claim, but a read…

Fact CheckingLogical FallaciesMisinformationPassage Retrieval+1

Geometry Meets Vision: Revisiting Pretrained Semantics in Distilled Fields

2025-10-03 · Zhiting Mei, Ola Shorinwa, Anirudha Majumdar arxiv

Semantic distillation in radiance fields has spurred significant advances in open-vocabulary robot policies, e.g., in manipulation and navigation, founded on pretrained semantics from large vision models. While prior wor…

Object LocalizationPose Estimation

Does Object Grounding Really Reduce Hallucination of Large Vision-Language Models?

2024-06-20 · Gregor Geigle, Radu Timofte, Goran Glavaš

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have recently dramatically pushed the state of the art in image captioning and many image understanding tasks (e.g., visual question answering). LVLMs, however, often \textit{hallucin…

Caption GenerationHallucinationImage CaptioningObject Hallucination+2

The Curious Case of Visual Grounding: Different Effects for Speech- and Text-based Language Encoders

2025-09-19 · Adrian Sauter, Willem Zuidema, Marianne de Heer Kloots arxiv

How does visual information included in training affect language processing in audio- and text-based deep learning models? We explore how such visual grounding affects model-internal representations of words, and find su…

Visual Grounding

Investigating Anisotropy in Visual Grounding under Controlled Counterfactual Perturbations

2026-05-09 · Gabriele Lombardo, Luigi Maiorana, Liliana Lo Presti, Marco La Cascia arxiv

Visual Grounding benchmarks assume that the object described by a referring expression is always present in the image, and grounding models are therefore rarely evaluated under semantically mismatched captions. In such c…

Referring ExpressionVisual Grounding