Evaluating Large Language Models on Misconceptions in Multi-Turn Medical Conversations
Patients seeking medical information often ask questions that embed incorrect assumptions or misconceptions. In such cases, safe medical communication requires not only answering the question, but identifying and correcting the underlying false belief. These interactions naturally unfold over multiple turns, a pattern now mirrored in interactions with LLMs. Yet current evaluation frameworks do not capture model behavior in these settings, where misconceptions can emerge, persist, or evolve over the course of a conversation. Whether LLMs can reliably correct such misconceptions over time remains largely unexamined. To study this, we introduce ThReadMed-QA, a multi-turn medical dialogue dataset of 2,437 patient-physician conversation threads comprising 8,204 question-answer pairs, derived from real patient interactions on AskDocs. This dataset enables systematic evaluation of whether models can detect and correct misconceptions under a multi-turn context. We evaluate five LLMs using a rubric-based LLM-as-a-Judge framework that scores responses based on their ability to identify and correct misconceptions. Our experiments reveal a consistent pattern: even frontier models that can address misconceptions in a single interaction degrade substantially over subsequent turns. GPT-5 and Claude-Haiku correct these false presuppositions around 85% on initial questions but drop to roughly 50% within two follow-ups. An oracle analysis replacing prior model outputs with physician responses shows that much of the degradation is driven by error propagation, while performance remains imperfect even under correct context. Even when models tend to correct misconceptions initially, their performance degrades substantially over later turns, leading to inconsistent and potentially unsafe guidance in patient-facing settings and highlighting the need for evaluation frameworks that capture multi-turn behavior.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Can Large Language Models Provide Security & Privacy Advice? Measuring the Ability of LLMs to Refute Misconceptions
Users seek security & privacy (S&P) advice from online resources, including trusted websites and content-sharing platforms. These resources help users understand S&P technologies and tools and suggest actionable strategi…
MisconceptionsMultiple-choiceNovice Learner and Expert Tutor: Evaluating Math Reasoning Abilities of Large Language Models with Misconceptions
We propose novel evaluations for mathematical reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) based on mathematical misconceptions. Our primary approach is to simulate LLMs as a novice learner and an expert tutor,…
MathMathematical ReasoningMisconceptionsData-Mining Textual Responses to Uncover Misconception Patterns
An important, yet largely unstudied, problem in student data analysis is to detect misconceptions from students' responses to open-response questions. Misconception detection enables instructors to deliver more targeted …
MisconceptionsMcMining: Automated Discovery of Misconceptions in Student Code
When learning to code, students often develop misconceptions about various programming language concepts. These can not only lead to bugs or inefficient code, but also slow down the learning of related concepts. In this …
Reasoning Trajectories for Socratic Debugging of Student Code: From Misconceptions to Contradictions and Updated Beliefs
In Socratic debugging, instructors guide students towards identifying and fixing a bug on their own, instead of providing the bug fix directly. Most novice programmer bugs are caused by programming misconceptions, namely…