How Should a Robot Assess Risk? Towards an Axiomatic Theory of Risk in Robotics
Endowing robots with the capability of assessing risk and making risk-aware decisions is widely considered a key step toward ensuring safety for robots operating under uncertainty. But, how should a robot quantify risk? A natural and common approach is to consider the framework whereby costs are assigned to stochastic outcomes - an assignment captured by a cost random variable. Quantifying risk then corresponds to evaluating a risk metric, i.e., a mapping from the cost random variable to a real number. Yet, the question of what constitutes a "good" risk metric has received little attention within the robotics community. The goal of this paper is to explore and partially address this question by advocating axioms that risk metrics in robotics applications should satisfy in order to be employed as rational assessments of risk. We discuss general representation theorems that precisely characterize the class of metrics that satisfy these axioms (referred to as distortion risk metrics), and provide instantiations that can be used in applications. We further discuss pitfalls of commonly used risk metrics in robotics, and discuss additional properties that one must consider in sequential decision making tasks. Our hope is that the ideas presented here will lead to a foundational framework for quantifying risk (and hence safety) in robotics applications.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Decision MakingSequential Decision MakingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Scenario-based Risk Evaluation
Risk measures such as Expected Shortfall (ES) and Value-at-Risk (VaR) have been prominent in banking regulation and financial risk management. Motivated by practical considerations in the assessment and management of ris…
ManagementAn axiomatic theory for anonymized risk sharing
We study an axiomatic framework for anonymized risk sharing. In contrast to traditional risk sharing settings, our framework requires no information on preferences, identities, private operations and realized losses from…
FairnessAn Interval-Valued Utility Theory for Decision Making with Dempster-Shafer Belief Functions
The main goal of this paper is to describe an axiomatic utility theory for Dempster-Shafer belief function lotteries. The axiomatic framework used is analogous to von Neumann-Morgenstern's utility theory for probabilisti…
Decision MakingScalar systemic risk measures and Aumann-Shapley allocations
We study two different contributions to the theory of (scalar) systemic risk measures. Namely the first aggregate or axiomatic approach and the first inject capital approach. For this purpose we establish a general frame…
A Deep Dive into Axiomatic Design -- Part I: Problem Formulation
Problem formulation translating customer needs and constraints into a minimum set of independent first-level functional requirements, is arguably the most critical step in every design framework, including axiomatic desi…