KG-ASG: Collision-Knowledge-Guided Closed-Loop Adversarial Scenario Generation With Primary-Support Attribution
Safety validation of autonomous driving systems requires high-risk scenario coverage, clear collision semantics, executable trajectories, and attributable multi-vehicle interactions. Existing safety-critical scenario generation methods often rely on low-level trajectory perturbations, collision-proxy optimization, or single-adversary search, which may produce adversarial samples with ambiguous collision causes or uncontrolled multi-vehicle collisions. This paper proposes KG-ASG, a collision-knowledge-guided closed-loop adversarial scenario generation framework with primary-support attribution. KG-ASG constructs a structured collision knowledge base and trains a lightweight Collision Expert to infer the target collision mode, the unique primary adversary, support vehicles, and their interaction roles. Guided by this semantic prior, multi-vehicle adversarial generation is formulated as a primary-support process, where the primary adversary induces the main conflict and support vehicles shape the surrounding risk structure without becoming additional colliders. Rule, physical, interaction-safety, and single-collider constraints are imposed as hard gates to filter non-executable samples. To handle reactive ego behaviors, planner-controller feedback is further used for failure diagnosis, candidate re-ranking, and terminal refinement. Experiments on WOMD scenarios reconstructed in MetaDrive show that KG-ASG achieves strong adversarial effectiveness while improving Valid Primary Attack, reducing multi-collision, and obtaining closed-loop recovery gains under IDM, Cruise, and Expert controllers. These results demonstrate that collision-knowledge guidance and primary-support single-collider reasoning improve adversarial effectiveness, interpretability, and executability for autonomous driving safety validation.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Autonomous DrivingSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
From Attacks to Curricula: Learnability-Guided Adversarial Training for Safe Autonomous Driving
Closed-loop adversarial training improves autonomous driving safety by exposing policies to rare safety-critical scenarios. Standard pipelines first generate adversarial scenarios and then sample them for policy optimiza…
Autonomous DrivingEvaluation as Evolution: Transforming Adversarial Diffusion into Closed-Loop Curricula for Autonomous Vehicles
Autonomous vehicles in interactive traffic environments are often limited by the scarcity of safety-critical tail events in static datasets, which biases learned policies toward average-case behaviors and reduces robustn…
Autonomous VehiclesLearning Lipschitz Feedback Policies from Expert Demonstrations: Closed-Loop Guarantees, Generalization and Robustness
In this work, we propose a framework to learn feedback control policies with guarantees on closed-loop generalization and adversarial robustness. These policies are learned directly from expert demonstrations, contained …
Adversarial RobustnessImitation LearningLearning Responsibility-Attributed Adversarial Scenarios for Testing Autonomous Vehicles
Establishing trustworthy safety assurance for autonomous driving systems (ADSs) requires evidence that failures arise from avoidable system deficiencies rather than unavoidable traffic conflicts. Current adversarial simu…
Autonomous VehiclesAutonomous DrivingG2DP: Diffusion Planning with Spatio-Temporal Grid Guidance
In autonomous driving, diffusion-based planners have emerged as a promising paradigm for robust motion planning in dense and interactive traffic, as they can effectively model diverse driving behaviors. However, their in…
Collision AvoidanceAutonomous DrivingMotion Planning