Learning to explore when mistakes are not allowed
Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning (GCRL) provides a versatile framework for developing unified controllers capable of handling wide ranges of tasks, exploring environments, and adapting behaviors. However, its reliance on trial-and-error poses challenges for real-world applications, as errors can result in costly and potentially damaging consequences. To address the need for safer learning, we propose a method that enables agents to learn goal-conditioned behaviors that explore without the risk of making harmful mistakes. Exploration without risks can seem paradoxical, but environment dynamics are often uniform in space, therefore a policy trained for safety without exploration purposes can still be exploited globally. Our proposed approach involves two distinct phases. First, during a pretraining phase, we employ safe reinforcement learning and distributional techniques to train a safety policy that actively tries to avoid failures in various situations. In the subsequent safe exploration phase, a goal-conditioned (GC) policy is learned while ensuring safety. To achieve this, we implement an action-selection mechanism leveraging the previously learned distributional safety critics to arbitrate between the safety policy and the GC policy, ensuring safe exploration by switching to the safety policy when needed. We evaluate our method in simulated environments and demonstrate that it not only provides substantial coverage of the goal space but also reduces the occurrence of mistakes to a minimum, in stark contrast to traditional GCRL approaches. Additionally, we conduct an ablation study and analyze failure modes, offering insights for future research directions.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Safe ExplorationSafe Reinforcement LearningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Trading off Mistakes and Don't-Know Predictions
We discuss an online learning framework in which the agent is allowed to say ``I don't know'' as well as making incorrect predictions on given examples. We analyze the trade off between saying ``I don't know'' and making…
A Deep Dive Into Large Language Model Code Generation Mistakes: What and Why?
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to their widespread application in automated code generation. However, these models can still generate defective code that deviates from the specification. Pre…
Code GenerationLanguage ModelingLanguage ModellingLarge Language ModelSegmentation of the veterinary cytological images for fast neoplastic tumors diagnosis
This paper shows the machine learning system which performs instance segmentation of cytological images in veterinary medicine. Eleven cell types were used directly and indirectly in the experiments, including damaged an…
Instance SegmentationSemantic SegmentationThe Power of Comparisons for Actively Learning Linear Classifiers
In the world of big data, large but costly to label datasets dominate many fields. Active learning, a semi-supervised alternative to the standard PAC-learning model, was introduced to explore whether adaptive labeling co…
Active LearningPAC learningThe Extended Littlestone's Dimension for Learning with Mistakes and Abstentions
This paper studies classification with an abstention option in the online setting. In this setting, examples arrive sequentially, the learner is given a hypothesis class $\mathcal H$, and the goal of the learner is to ei…