paper-with-me

Papers

MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitions

2025-05-29 · Mislav Balunović, Jasper Dekoninck, Ivo Petrov, Nikola Jovanović, Martin Vechev

The rapid advancement of reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) has led to notable improvements on mathematical benchmarks. However, many of the most commonly used evaluation datasets (e.g., AIME 2024) are widely available online, making it difficult to disentangle genuine reasoning from potential memorization. Furthermore, these benchmarks do not evaluate proof-writing capabilities, which are crucial for many mathematical tasks. To address this, we introduce MathArena, a new benchmark based on the following key insight: recurring math competitions provide a stream of high-quality, challenging problems that can be used for real-time evaluation of LLMs. By evaluating models as soon as new problems are released, we effectively eliminate the risk of contamination. Using this framework, we find strong signs of contamination in AIME 2024. Nonetheless, evaluations on harder competitions, such as SMT 2025 -- published well after model release dates -- demonstrate impressive reasoning capabilities in top-performing models. MathArena is also the first benchmark for proof-writing capabilities. On USAMO 2025, even top models score below 25%, far behind their performance on final-answer tasks. So far, we have evaluated 30 models across five competitions, totaling 149 problems. As an evolving benchmark, MathArena will continue to track the progress of LLMs on newly released competitions, ensuring rigorous and up-to-date evaluation of mathematical reasoning.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2505.23281

Code (1)

eth-sri/matharena 공식 구현

Tasks

MathMathematical ReasoningMemorization

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Beyond Benchmarks: MathArena as an Evaluation Platform for Mathematics with LLMs

2026-05-01 · Jasper Dekoninck, Nikola Jovanović, Tim Gehrunger, Kári Rögnvaldsson 외 arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly capable mathematical collaborators, but static benchmarks are no longer sufficient for evaluating progress: they are often narrow in scope, quickly saturated, and ra…

Mathematical Reasoning

Proof or Bluff? Evaluating LLMs on 2025 USA Math Olympiad

2025-03-27 · Ivo Petrov, Jasper Dekoninck, Lyuben Baltadzhiev, Maria Drencheva 외

Recent math benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) such as MathArena indicate that state-of-the-art reasoning models achieve impressive performance on mathematical competitions like AIME, with the leading model, Gem…

MathMathematical Reasoning

AMO-Bench: Large Language Models Still Struggle in High School Math Competitions

2025-10-30 · Shengnan An, Xunliang Cai, Xuezhi Cao, Xiaoyu Li 외 arxiv

We present AMO-Bench, an Advanced Mathematical reasoning benchmark with Olympiad level or even higher difficulty, comprising 50 human-crafted problems. Existing benchmarks have widely leveraged high school math competiti…

Mathematical Reasoning

RefGrader: Automated Grading of Mathematical Competition Proofs using Agentic Workflows

2025-10-10 · Hamed Mahdavi, Pouria Mahdavinia, Samira Malek, Pegah Mohammadipour 외 arxiv

State-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs have progressed from struggling on proof-based Olympiad problems to solving most of the IMO 2025 problems, with leading systems reportedly handling 5 of 6 problems. Given this progress, we as…

CombiGraph-Vis: A Curated Multimodal Olympiad Benchmark for Discrete Mathematical Reasoning

2025-10-31 · Hamed Mahdavi, Pouria Mahdavinia, Alireza Farhadi, Pegah Mohammadipour 외 arxiv

State-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs have progressed from struggling on proof-based Olympiad problems to solving most of the IMO 2025 problems, with leading systems reportedly handling 5 of 6 problems. Given this progress, we as…

Mathematical Reasoning