paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

OPV: Outcome-based Process Verifier for Efficient Long Chain-of-Thought Verification

2025-12-11 · Zijian Wu, Lingkai Kong, Wenwei Zhang, Songyang Gao, Yuzhe Gu, Zhongrui Cai, Tianyou Ma, Yuhong Liu, Zhi Wang, Runyuan Ma, Guangyu Wang, Wei Li, Conghui He, Dahua Lin, Kai Chen arxiv

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant progress in solving complex reasoning tasks by Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). This advancement is also inseparable from the oversight automated by reliable verifiers. However, current outcome-based verifiers (OVs) are unable to inspect the unreliable intermediate steps in the long reasoning chains of thought (CoTs). Meanwhile, current process-based verifiers (PVs) have difficulties in reliably detecting errors in the complex long CoTs, limited by the scarcity of high-quality annotations due to the prohibitive costs of human annotations. Therefore, we propose the Outcome-based Process Verifier (OPV), which verifies the rationale process of summarized outcomes from long CoTs to achieve both accurate and efficient verification and enable large-scale annotation. To empower the proposed verifier, we adopt an iterative active learning framework with expert annotations to progressively improve the verification capability of OPV with fewer annotation costs. Specifically, in each iteration, the most uncertain cases of the current best OPV are annotated and then subsequently used to train a new OPV through Rejection Fine-Tuning (RFT) and RLVR for the next round. Extensive experiments demonstrate OPV's superior performance and broad applicability. It achieves new state-of-the-art results on our held-out OPV-Bench, outperforming much larger open-source models such as Qwen3-Max-Preview with an F1 score of 83.1 compared to 76.3. Furthermore, OPV effectively detects false positives within synthetic dataset, closely align with expert assessment. When collaborating with policy models, OPV consistently yields performance gains, e.g., raising the accuracy of DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B from 55.2% to 73.3% on AIME2025 as the compute budget scales.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2512.10756

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Tasks

Reinforcement LearningActive Learning

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

VerIPO: Cultivating Long Reasoning in Video-LLMs via Verifier-Gudied Iterative Policy Optimization

2025-05-25 · Yunxin Li, Xinyu Chen, Zitao Li, Zhenyu Liu 외

Applying Reinforcement Learning (RL) to Video Large Language Models (Video-LLMs) shows significant promise for complex video reasoning. However, popular Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) methods, such as outcome-based Grou…

Reinforcement Learning (RL)

Stepwise Penalization for Length-Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

2026-02-27 · Xintong Li, Sha Li, Rongmei Lin, Hongye Jin 외 arxiv

Large reasoning models improve with more test-time computation, but often overthink, producing unnecessarily long chains-of-thought that raise cost without improving accuracy. Prior reinforcement learning approaches typi…

Reinforcement Learning

Learning to Rank Chain-of-Thought: An Energy-Based Approach with Outcome Supervision

2025-05-21 · Eric Hanchen Jiang, Haozheng Luo, Shengyuan Pang, Xiaomin Li 외

Mathematical reasoning presents a significant challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs), often requiring robust multi step logical consistency. While Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting elicits reasoning steps, it doesn't …

GSM8KLearning-To-RankMathMathematical Reasoning

Verify to Amplify: Improving Reasoning via Learned Chain-of-Thought Verification

2026-03-03 · Maria-Florina Balcan, Avrim Blum, Kiriaki Fragkia, Zhiyuan Li 외 arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) using chain-of-thought have demonstrated great potential for solving complex reasoning and planning tasks. Despite these advances, LLM-generated outputs remain susceptible to errors, making v…

Zero-Shot Verification-guided Chain of Thoughts

2025-01-21 · Jishnu Ray Chowdhury, Cornelia Caragea

Previous works have demonstrated the effectiveness of Chain-of-Thought (COT) prompts and verifiers in guiding Large Language Models (LLMs) through the space of reasoning. However, most such studies either use a fine-tune…