Rethinking Efficient Crack Segmentation with Task-Aligned Structural-Directional Modeling
Recent crack segmentation methods often follow generic semantic segmentation designs, using stronger backbones, hybrid CNN-Transformer-Mamba encoders, and auxiliary enhancement branches. Although effective, this raises whether stronger generic feature mixing is the most suitable direction for crack segmentation. We instead formulate crack segmentation as sparse structural recovery. Cracks have limited category-level semantics but strong morphological regularities, being thin, sparse, anisotropic, locally fragmented, and easily confused with textures or shadows. Thus, the key bottleneck lies in preserving weak structural evidence, recovering directional continuity, and suppressing background coupling. We propose RIFT, a compact family of morphology-aligned crack segmentation models. Rather than compressing a complex generic architecture, RIFT is simple by design, preserving local evidence, aggregating cooperative directional continuity, and restoring crack structures through lightweight multi-scale fusion. Experiments on four public benchmarks show that RIFT achieves the best or tied-best results across the 16 main metrics against reproduced representative baselines. RIFT-B gives the strongest overall accuracy, while RIFT-T provides the best deployment efficiency with only 0.47M parameters and high inference speed. Topology-aware evaluation, ablations, transfer experiments, and visualizations further verify that task-aligned simplicity can match or surpass complex hybrid architectures when its inductive bias fits crack morphology. Code: https://github.com/xauat-liushipeng/RIFT
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Semantic SegmentationCrack SegmentationSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
What's Cracking? A Review and Analysis of Deep Learning Methods for Structural Crack Segmentation, Detection and Quantification
Surface cracks are a very common indicator of potential structural faults. Their early detection and monitoring is an important factor in structural health monitoring. Left untreated, they can grow in size over time and …
Crack SegmentationStructural Health MonitoringCrackESS: A Self-Prompting Crack Segmentation System for Edge Devices
Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is a sustainable and essential approach for infrastructure maintenance, enabling the early detection of structural defects. Leveraging computer vision (CV) methods for automated infrast…
Computational EfficiencyCrack Segmentationparameter-efficient fine-tuningSegmentation+1Training-Free Decoding of SAM3 Semantic Responses for Cross-Domain Infrastructure Crack Segmentation
Cross-domain infrastructure crack segmentation is challenged by variations in materials, imaging conditions, crack morphology, and background interference. Although text-promptable foundation models reduce the need for t…
Crack SegmentationFlexiCrackNet: A Flexible Pipeline for Enhanced Crack Segmentation with General Features Transfered from SAM
Automatic crack segmentation is a cornerstone technology for intelligent visual perception modules in road safety maintenance and structural integrity systems. Existing deep learning models and ``pre-training + fine-tuni…
Computational EfficiencyCrack SegmentationGeneral KnowledgeSegmentation+2On-Device Crack Segmentation for Edge Structural Health Monitoring
Crack segmentation can play a critical role in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) by enabling accurate identification of crack size and location, which allows to monitor structural damages over time. However, deploying d…
Crack SegmentationSegmentationStructural Health Monitoring