Risk Estimation for Automated Driving
Safety is a central requirement for automated vehicles. As such, the assessment of risk in automated driving is key in supporting both motion planning technologies and safety evaluation. In automated driving, risk is characterized by two aspects. The first aspect is the uncertainty on the state estimates of other road participants by an automated vehicle. The second aspect is the severity of a collision event with said traffic participants. Here, the uncertainty aspect typically causes the risk to be non-zero for near-collision events. This makes risk particularly useful for automated vehicle motion planning. Namely, constraining or minimizing risk naturally navigates the automated vehicle around traffic participants while keeping a safety distance based on the level of uncertainty and the potential severity of the impending collision. Existing approaches to calculate the risk either resort to empirical modeling or severe approximations, and, hence, lack generalizability and accuracy. In this paper, we combine recent advances in collision probability estimation with the concept of collision severity to develop a general method for accurate risk estimation. The proposed method allows us to assign individual severity functions for different collision constellations, such as, e.g., frontal or side collisions. Furthermore, we show that the proposed approach is computationally efficient, which is beneficial, e.g., in real-time motion planning applications. The programming code for an exemplary implementation of Gaussian uncertainties is also provided.
Code (0)
등록된 구현이 없습니다.
Tasks
Motion PlanningSimilar Papers 제목 키워드 기반
Belief-Space Residual Risk for Automated Driving under Localization Uncertainty
Residual risk metrics have recently been introduced to assess the safety implications of automated driving systems. Existing approaches typically assume a deterministic ego pose and concentrate mainly on perception error…
Comparing Normalizing Flows with Kernel Density Estimation in Estimating Risk of Automated Driving Systems
The development of safety validation methods is essential for the safe deployment and operation of Automated Driving Systems (ADSs). One of the goals of safety validation is to prospectively evaluate the risk of an ADS d…
Density EstimationRisk Management Core -- Towards an Explicit Representation of Risk in Automated Driving
While current automotive safety standards provide implicit guidance on how unreasonable risk can be avoided, manufacturers are required to specify risk acceptance criteria for Automated Driving Systems (SAE Level 3 and h…
ManagementFacial Emotion Recognition does not detect feeling unsafe in automated driving
Trust and perceived safety play a crucial role in the public acceptance of automated vehicles. To understand perceived risk, an experiment was conducted using a driving simulator under two automated driving styles and op…
Facial Expression RecognitionFacial Emotion RecognitionAdversarial Examples in Environment Perception for Automated Driving (Review)
The renaissance of deep learning has led to the massive development of automated driving. However, deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples. The perturbations of adversarial examples are imperceptible …
Adversarial Robustness