paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

Stress Testing Deliberative Alignment for Anti-Scheming Training

2025-09-19 · Bronson Schoen, Evgenia Nitishinskaya, Mikita Balesni, Axel Højmark, Felix Hofstätter, Jérémy Scheurer, Alexander Meinke, Jason Wolfe, Teun van der Weij, Alex Lloyd, Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Angela Fan, Andrei Matveiakin, Rusheb Shah, Marcus Williams, Amelia Glaese, Boaz Barak, Wojciech Zaremba, Marius Hobbhahn arxiv

Highly capable AI systems could secretly pursue misaligned goals -- what we call "scheming". Because a scheming AI would deliberately try to hide its misaligned goals and actions, measuring and mitigating scheming requires different strategies than are typically used in ML. We propose that assessing anti-scheming interventions requires at least (1) testing propensity to scheme on far out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks, (2) evaluating whether lack of scheming is driven by situational awareness, and (3) checking for robustness to pre-existing misaligned goals. We use a broad category of "covert actions" -- such as secretly breaking rules or intentionally underperforming in tests -- as a proxy for scheming, and design evaluations for covert actions. We then stress-test deliberative alignment as a case study for anti-scheming. Across 26 OOD evaluations (180+ environments), deliberative alignment reduces covert action rates (OpenAI o3: 13%->0.4%) but does not fully eliminate them. Our mitigation is also able to largely stop agents from pursuing a hidden goal previously trained into the model, but we still find misbehavior after additional red-teaming. We find that models' chain-of-thought (CoT) often demonstrates awareness of being evaluated for alignment, and show causal evidence that this awareness decreases covert behavior, while unawareness increases it. Therefore, we cannot exclude that the observed reductions in covert action rates are at least partially driven by situational awareness. While we rely on human-legible CoT for training, studying situational awareness, and demonstrating clear evidence of misalignment, our ability to rely on this degrades as models continue to depart from reasoning in standard English. We encourage research into alignment mitigations for scheming and their assessment, especially for the adversarial case of deceptive alignment, which this paper does not address.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2509.15541

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Training Deliberative Monitors for Black-Box Scheming Detection

2026-05-28 · Aditya Sinha, Akshat Naik, Victor Gillioz, Simon Storf 외 arxiv

As autonomous agents become more capable of performing real-world tasks, distinguishing scheming behavior from benign task pursuit may become a central AI control problem. Existing monitors often rely on chain-of-thought…

Reinforcement Learning

SchemeArena: Factorized Stress Testing of Scheming in LLM Agents

2026-09-08 · Jie Ruan, Inderjeet Nair, Amy Liu, Muhammad Khalifa 외 hf

We study scheming in LLM agents, in which agents covertly pursue misaligned goals. Our focus is to understand how scheming arises from the interaction of key factors, such as instrumental goals, environmental affordances…

Realistic honeypot evaluations for scheming propensity

2026-05-28 · Victoria Krakovna, David Lindner, Lewis Ho, Sebastian Farquhar 외 arxiv

We introduce scheming honeypot evaluations, a framework for testing whether models will pursue instrumental goals if given the opportunity. Our scheming honeypot evaluations take the form of coding tasks in Google's alig…

Sycophancy Towards Researchers Drives Performative Misalignment

2026-06-07 · David D. Baek, Xinnuo Li, Anay Gupta, Taslim Mahbub 외 arxiv

The increasing situational awareness of language models raises safety concerns: models might be aware when they are evaluated, and adjust their behavior to evade monitoring and resist modification, e.g., pretending to be…

OpenAI o1 System Card

2024-12-21 · OpenAI, :, Aaron Jaech, Adam Kalai 외

The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason using chain of thought. These advanced reasoning capabilities provide new avenues for improving the safety and robustness of our models. In…

ManagementRed Teaming