paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

The Oversight Game: Learning to Cooperatively Balance an AI Agent's Safety and Autonomy

2025-10-30 · William Overman, Mohsen Bayati arxiv

As increasingly capable agents are deployed, a central safety challenge is how to retain meaningful human control without modifying the underlying system. We study a minimal control interface in which an agent chooses whether to act autonomously (play) or defer (ask), while a human simultaneously chooses whether to be permissive (trust) or engage in oversight (oversee), and model this interaction as a two-player Markov game. When this game forms a Markov Potential Game, we prove an alignment guarantee: any increase in the agent's utility from acting more autonomously cannot decrease the human's value. This establishes a form of intrinsic alignment where the agent's incentive to seek autonomy is structurally coupled to the human's welfare. Practically, the framework induces a transparent control layer that encourages the agent to defer when risky and act when safe. While we use gridworld simulations to illustrate the emergence of this collaboration, our primary validation involves an agentic tool-use task in which two 30B parameter language models are fine-tuned via independent policy gradient. We demonstrate that even as the agents learn to coordinate on the fly, this framework effectively reduces safety violations in realistic, open-ended environments.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2510.26752

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

Back to the Future: Efficient, Time-Consistent Solutions in Reach-Avoid Games

2021-09-16 · Dennis R. Anthony, Duy P. Nguyen, David Fridovich-Keil, Jaime F. Fisac

We study the class of reach-avoid dynamic games in which multiple agents interact noncooperatively, and each wishes to satisfy a distinct target criterion while avoiding a failure criterion. Reach-avoid games are commonl…

Motion Planning

Incentive-Aware AI Safety via Strategic Resource Allocation: A Stackelberg Security Games Perspective

2026-02-06 · Cheol Woo Kim, Davin Choo, Tzeh Yuan Neoh, Milind Tambe arxiv

As AI systems grow more capable and autonomous, ensuring their safety and reliability requires not only model-level alignment but also strategic oversight of the humans and institutions involved in their development and …

CoopEval: Benchmarking Cooperation-Sustaining Mechanisms and LLM Agents in Social Dilemmas

2026-04-16 · Emanuel Tewolde, Xiao Zhang, David Guzman Piedrahita, Vincent Conitzer 외 arxiv

It is increasingly important that LLM agents interact effectively and safely with other goal-pursuing agents, yet, recent works report the opposite trend: LLMs with stronger reasoning capabilities behave _less_ cooperati…

Decision Making

LieCraft: A Multi-Agent Framework for Evaluating Deceptive Capabilities in Language Models

2026-03-06 · Matthew Lyle Olson, Neale Ratzlaff, Musashi Hinck, Tri Nguyen 외 arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive general-purpose capabilities but also introduce serious safety risks, particularly the potential for deception as models acquire increased agency and human oversight dimini…

A Contextual-Bandit Oversight Game with Two-Sided Informational Asymmetry

2026-06-30 · Yunjin Tong arxiv

We study runtime human oversight of an AI agent when private information runs in both directions: the human privately knows her reward function, while the AI privately knows the quality of the action it proposes. This is…

Reinforcement Learning