paper-with-me

홈 › Papers

The Deliberative Illusion: Diagnosing Factual Attrition and Stance Homogenization in Multi-Agent LLM Deliberation

2026-06-02 · Herun Wan, Jiaying Wu, Minnan Luo, Fanxiao Li, Ningnan Wang, Nancy F. Chen, Min-Yen Kan arxiv

Multi-agent LLM systems often treat consensus as evidence of successful interaction. For deliberative problems, however, reliability depends on whether agents preserve the facts and viewpoints needed to interpret an issue. We identify the deliberative illusion: discussion produces (1) factual attrition, the progressive loss of issue-critical facts, alongside (2) stance homogenization, the collapse of diverse positions toward consensus. To measure this process, we introduce DelibTrace, a framework that decomposes each issue into atomic facts, labels issue-critical ones, distributes them across agents, and tracks their survival across discussion rounds. Across ethical and news-based deliberation with three representative LLM families, multi-agent discussion erases up to 72% of issue-critical facts. This loss is consequential: retained evidence can reconstruct the issue misleadingly, final stances remain anchored in base-model priors, and a single malicious agent can inject misinformation into the shrinking shared context. These results reveal a sharper risk: agents can agree more while knowing less. We call for evaluations that measure which facts, uncertainties, and legitimate disagreements survive interaction.

📄 PDF Abstract BibTeX arXiv:2606.03032

Code (0)

등록된 구현이 없습니다.

Similar Papers 제목 키워드 기반

"How to make them stay?" -- Diverse Counterfactual Explanations of Employee Attrition

2023-03-08 · André Artelt, Andreas Gregoriades

Employee attrition is an important and complex problem that can directly affect an organisation's competitiveness and performance. Explaining the reasons why employees leave an organisation is a key human resource manage…

counterfactualCounterfactual ExplanationManagement

Being Kind Isn't Always Being Safe: Diagnosing Affective Hallucination in LLMs

2025-08-23 · Sewon Kim, Jiwon Kim, Seungwoo Shin, Hyejin Chung 외 arxiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly engaged in emotionally vulnerable conversations that extend beyond information seeking to moments of personal distress. As they adopt affective tones and simulate empathy, th…

The Illusionist's Prompt: Exposing the Factual Vulnerabilities of Large Language Models with Linguistic Nuances

2025-04-01 · Yining Wang, Yuquan Wang, Xi Li, Mi Zhang 외

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance, they are increasingly relied upon as real-time sources of information by non-expert users. To ensure the factuality of the information they provide, much research has …

Hallucination

Binocular disparity as an explanation for the moon illusion

2013-01-12 · Joseph Antonides, Toshiro Kubota

We present another explanation for the moon illusion, the phenomenon in which the moon looks larger near the horizon than near the zenith. In our model of the moon illusion, the sky is considered a spatially-contiguous a…

Alternates, Assemble! Selecting Optimal Alternates for Citizens' Assemblies

2025-06-02 · Angelos Assos, Carmel Baharav, Bailey Flanigan, Ariel Procaccia

An increasingly influential form of deliberative democracy centers on citizens' assemblies, where randomly selected people discuss policy questions. The legitimacy of these panels hinges on their representation of the br…

Computational Efficiency